Simply enter your email address, and we’ll send you a PDF version of the guide.
AS A BONUS, you'll also receive a checklist and set of questions to use when considering an
oil and gas land management system.
A Detailed Look at the Critical Nature of Advanced Technologies for Today’s Land Management Teams
Copyright © P2 Energy Solutions
What does good land management look like? Today, it is a holistic approach to managing the entire E&P land life cycle, using technology and automation as the foundation for a thriving program. Twenty-first century land management is a combination of interactive mapping, streamlined lease acquisitions, automated recommendation processes, and one-click data analysis that allow land professionals to effectively manage their land portfolios.
Land Managers
The ability to coalesce these key players and the processes and platforms they use helps ensure lease operational effectiveness. Visualizing and interpreting land data in one place is essential to the overall management of an effective land program.
As you embark on the process of choosing a land system that will benefit your department and organization, there are must-have attributes to look for; in other words, search for a solution that provides the following:
As a small or mid-size upstream oil and gas and organization, do you find that the software you’re using for land management is dated, requiring you to rely on spreadsheets to fill the gaps? Are people within your organization spending so much time multi-tasking that they don’t have time to pay attention to key indicators related to land and lease obligations? Perhaps you’re a larger organization that needs to better utilize land data more effectively to identify opportunities to optimize across the board. In either scenario, understanding how to strengthen your land management practices can lead to improved decision making, plus tighter cross-departmental integration.
Choosing a land solution is a decision that will impact your organization for five, even 10 years, given the number of integrations to other systems and processes inherent in implementing this type of software. Thoughtful, diligent research should be a mandatory part of your selection process.
Read on to learn about the nine steps you should take when considering the purchase of a new or upgraded land and lease management system that will support your organization and help create avenues toward success.
Combination of interactive mapping, streamlined lease acquisitions, automated recommendation processes,
and one-click data analysis
In order to compete in today’s environment, a land department needs to scale; in other words, there needs to be processes, integrations, or technologies that drive improvement and efficiency, as well as time and cost savings. Not sure how to make incremental progress?
Start with this handy guide!
The best way to understand the challenges and limitations of your current systems and processes is to involve all stakeholders early. Because land impacts so many other functions in an upstream oil and gas company, it’s important to not only include core stakeholders, but also those who rely on land data.
As important as how you conduct your business process is the why. Are your processes the result of years of workarounds using the tools you currently have in place? What would those processes look like in a perfect scenario?
With built-in flexibility and scalability, P2's land solutions allow you to seamlessly manage your entire workflow from lease acquisition to land administration
Landmen
Lease Administrators
GIS Managers
Division Order Analysts
Finance Personnel
How does an upstream oil & gas company know when it’s time to reevaluate its land system? (Or perhaps consider software implementation for the first time.) If you’re experiencing more than a few of the following challenges in your land department, it may be time for you to evaluate a change.
46% of respondents said data quality (accuracy/consistency) is a significant challenge/issue. Poor data quality is the result of land departments using spreadsheets to manage data. The following is a breakdown of how often various land functions rely on spreadsheets for process.
“Ditch the spreadsheets and use advanced technologies to derive value from your data.” – PwC
Often lowering land budgets by up to 30%, P2 iLandMan is the only cloud, tract, and formation-based system that automates the entire E&P land life cycle, giving land professionals accurate net acreage values and real-time visibility into lease positions.
Pros
Cons
The next step in finding the right solution is to identify the unique needs of your land management group and the departments that rely on them. The best approach is to determine what problems you’d like the software to solve for, and what metrics will define success.
What issues do employees encounter on a regular basis? What is taking a long time? What takes too many steps? How often does work have to be redone? Is data entry being duplicated?
Are there opportunities to shave minutes, hours, even days from tasks surrounding land management? By using a database (land solution), information like owner names and tract descriptions are associated, thereby reducing data entry. Further, GIS mapping systems that are connected to lease data give land departments a visual representation of their prospect area, providing them a comprehensive overview and allowing them to make decisions more efficiently. Knowing the value of each process and task will help you identify must-have efficiencies in a new system.
When meeting with your champion stakeholders, start at a high level and identify the specific business challenges that need to be addressed. Think about why you are ready to evaluate a new solution for your land management needs. Can it support complex land and lease scenarios? Does it handle tasks and processes that are otherwise managed in spreadsheets?
Developing a comprehensive list of business and technical requirements based on the processes you have identified is the next step. Whether you have a large group of stakeholders weighing in or a smaller team being represented, you will need to identify leads for each category of requirements.
Important Functional Requirements to Consider:
Specific Land Management Requirements to Keep in Mind
Your new software must be functional, adaptable, and sophisticated. Crucial, however, is that it’s land specific and tailored to your everyday practices. Ensure the software you choose is:
Using your exhaustive list of requirements, break them out into “must-haves” and “nice-to-haves.” It’s unlikely that an off-the-shelf solution will meet every one of your criteria, so consider which requirements would be assigned to these groups.
During this step, aim to whittle down your ‘potential software systems’ list to three to five choices based on two primary sources:
Work to identify the systems most suitable for your team, processes, and goals defined in the previous steps – referencing your requirements list at all times.
Review your working list of essential functionalities, must-haves, and nice-to-haves against the matrix of potential solutions to help determine which providers offer most of the features you are looking for based on publicly available information. Keep in mind the features that you had not considered but discovered during your research.
Platform Preference
Get with your stakeholders, including IT, and decide what type of platform will best serve your needs. If a vendor only offers or supports an on-premise option, and you’re looking for a cloud-based solution, cross it off the list. Consider whether you are leaning toward an on-premise solution today but need the flexibility of moving to the cloud in the future.
Services Options
Does the vendor have a deep services bench and a proven on time, on budget implementation history? Are there other service providers with experience implementing each vendor’s software?
Vendor Status and Vision
Take into consideration the longevity, depth of product line, and breadth of support for the product. Focus on providers that are clearly designing products with the future in mind. This is evident if they are building products with integration capabilities. Choosing a platform that has a broad user base allows you to capitalize on the associated resources, knowledge base, and tech community.
Read more: Evolution, Innovation, and Modernization in Land Management
Budget
You may not have exact costs, but based on your research, you should be able to assign each prospective software to a cost tier: low, medium, and high, for example.
*Make notes as to why you’ve eliminated each potential vendor and/or package. If your requirements change, you can reintroduce those options later.
With three to five strong options in hand, it’s time to request a demo from each one, ensuring you are prepared to ask a lot of questions.
During the demos, be transparent about your challenges and requirements. The more potential vendors know about your needs, the better they can communicate and demonstrate how their software can help. Take copious notes about what you like and don’t like.
Educating each vendor’s sales team on your selection criteria will help them be more responsive. If they know what you need and when you need it, they’re in a better position to fully demonstrate their solutions’ capabilities for each requirement. Don’t be afraid to ask for a more granular look into the features and functionalities that pertain to your specific situation.
Concentrate on assessing the software against your criteria using a requirements matrix. If there are multiple stakeholders attending the demos, consider giving them each the list of requirements with scorecard style points that they can award to each vendor for each requirement.
Post demos, don’t make a final decision until everyone has thoroughly scored and ranked each solution. Ask for supplemental materials if needed (screenshots, a copy of the recorded demo, etc.). Ensure your top choice can satisfy nearly every “must-have” and most of your “nice-to-haves.”
If you find yourself with a hung jury, consider a roundtable discussion and vote, or opt for another demo that addresses stakeholders’ questions and concerns. Conversely, if you think you have a winner, hold off on communicating the decision until you have completed the additional steps below.
When considering total cost of ownership, simultaneously consider the potential return on investment. The benefits of a particular software system and how they specifically address your needs and requirements should be taken into consideration first.
Overall Cost
Choose a system that helps you optimize and grow. Resist making a decision based solely on cost. Focus on usability, integration capabilities, and features/functionalities that will help streamline workflows and meet key performance indicators. Software can be expensive, but if it meets your requirements and solves a need, the return on investment can be favorable.
Pricing Specifics
Understand the 360-degree view of what you’re purchasing and nail down specifics on what is included in the software, what’s not, and what add-ons might cost down the road.
When you start discussions with vendors, uncover specific costs around the following:
It’s now time to verify that the provider and its product are what they have claimed to be. Ask for two or three customer references who have similar portfolios, operate in the same regions as you do, and/or are similar in size.
Questions to ask:
Consider whether the vendor exclusively focuses on upstream oil and gas land management and has experience across the domain. Confirm they will be there to support the system with regular product updates, reliable customer support, and an active user community to maximize your investment.
After references check out, costs have been nailed down, and all internal parties are aligned, review all considerations.
You should be ready to select your new software system, and prepare for your implementation project.
Land management is a crucial link in the upstream value chain because the health of every exploration and production organization depends on it. For land departments to remain competitive now and into the future, investments in technology should be prioritized. Automation of repetitive and manual tasks, monitoring, and reporting will improve systems and operations and allow teams to use real-time data to assess performance and drive decisions.
What are the three greatest land data/systems challenges faced by your organization?
Spreadsheets/offline databases used to a great extent by process
Other Functions/Departments Reliant on Land Data
Having early and ongoing involvement of stakeholders is critical because even the best software can fail if internal users aren’t fully on board.
Core Stakeholders
Why is Land Management a Critical Component to the Upstream Value Chain?
How Key Players Keep a Land Department Running Smoothly
How to Recognize It’s Time for a Change
Why Use Industry-Specific Software?
Land Software Must-Haves
How to Select the Right Software for Your Land Management Department
Parting Thoughts
Read more: The History of Land Management Systems